NeuroLove

Loving Neuroscience comes from understanding

252 notes

PET and cancer?
FLT PET is a relatively newer way to look at cancer.  This shows the image of a woman with leukemia (blood cell/bone marrow cancer) before and after chemotherapy.  FLT is similar to FDG (which is the glucose usage monitoring PET ligand I discussed before).  FLT also shows glucose usage but it seems to be better at showing cancer-related cell division activity than FDG is.  It won’t of course only show cancer activity, but it might help to visualize cancer during treatments and thus, treatment success.  This is an interesting usage of PET and I’ll be curious to see if as time goes on it will become more mainstream.  I think it’s really interesting that you can see the affected bone marrow here. This is not a structural scan at all- you do not get to see bones with PET- it’s not like x-rays or CT scans. PET is functional imaging, which means you just see where that radioligand is active, and in this case, you can see it in bone marrow, and it almost looks like a colored x-ray! Of course, PET imaging itself has some downsides, which I will try to talk about in the future that might prevent something like this from becoming more commonplace.
[Image Source]

PET and cancer?

FLT PET is a relatively newer way to look at cancer. This shows the image of a woman with leukemia (blood cell/bone marrow cancer) before and after chemotherapy. FLT is similar to FDG (which is the glucose usage monitoring PET ligand I discussed before). FLT also shows glucose usage but it seems to be better at showing cancer-related cell division activity than FDG is. It won’t of course only show cancer activity, but it might help to visualize cancer during treatments and thus, treatment success. This is an interesting usage of PET and I’ll be curious to see if as time goes on it will become more mainstream. I think it’s really interesting that you can see the affected bone marrow here. This is not a structural scan at all- you do not get to see bones with PET- it’s not like x-rays or CT scans. PET is functional imaging, which means you just see where that radioligand is active, and in this case, you can see it in bone marrow, and it almost looks like a colored x-ray! Of course, PET imaging itself has some downsides, which I will try to talk about in the future that might prevent something like this from becoming more commonplace.

[Image Source]

Filed under pet cancer science

  1. allana690undercover reblogged this from scinerds
  2. theolduvaigorge reblogged this from neurolove
  3. midgetmonkey reblogged this from a-sine-of-sanity
  4. rock7ch reblogged this from a-sine-of-sanity
  5. save-their-light reblogged this from a-sine-of-sanity
  6. a-sine-of-sanity reblogged this from neurolove
  7. yayomiguel212 reblogged this from neurolove
  8. youcanneverhavetoomuchtea reblogged this from neurolove
  9. drvasenkahotep reblogged this from abbyroseholmes
  10. abbyroseholmes reblogged this from neurolove
  11. imsorryalberto reblogged this from fuckyeahmedicalstuff
  12. rafikireflection reblogged this from neurolove
  13. belleoh reblogged this from neurolove
  14. awesomebl0g reblogged this from fuckyeahmedicalstuff
  15. 71141josemd reblogged this from fuckyeahmedicalstuff
  16. osmodial reblogged this from neurolove
  17. bcomingfree reblogged this from fyeahmedlab
  18. indelikatt reblogged this from fuckyeahmedicalstuff
  19. arrythmia reblogged this from fuckyeahmedicalstuff
  20. trabeculas-carneas reblogged this from scinerds
  21. tu-mas-interno-exterior reblogged this from neurolove
  22. archaeologyandadorable reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  23. dead-men-talking reblogged this from fyeahmedlab
  24. fyeahmedlab reblogged this from neurolove
  25. towfie reblogged this from tomatheninja
  26. kookiemagician reblogged this from fuckyeahmedicalstuff
  27. sassyourpantsoff reblogged this from fuckyeahmedicalstuff
  28. mrsroberds reblogged this from neurolove and added:
    I have this
  29. pneupnurse reblogged this from dorasnursing